Fulfillment
Merton's 'Springs of Contemplation' is essentially the transcript of a retreat conference that brought together groups of contemplative nuns at the Abbey of Gethsemani. There were two sessions - December 1967 and May 1968. One of the last topics was celibacy, and how it was a gift, and also a challenge. Apparently, a lot of priests were leaving the priesthood to marry. Merton states that he found a lot of personal fulfillment in celibacy, and in return one of the nuns said, of the people she had dealt with:
(From the nun): But you can't tell people this (that celibacy is fulfilling). And sometimes priests' training is purely on the intellectual level and nothing on the emotional.
(Merton's response): Nobody has told them what celibacy is all about. The other part of this, which I think is perfectly true, is that celibacy should be optional for the secular clergy. Because there is just no reason why not. If a priest wants to stay celibate, fine, but if not, there's no reason why he shouldn't be married, except for the historical reason that in the Latin Church it's always been connected with a state of good discipline and ecumenicity. So many priests have a drinking problem now. Of course, you don't know what they would do if they were married, either. There are no easy solutions to these problems. But there's a lot of hogwash in glorifying marriage. I think celibacy will have to become optional. Once it's optional, people will see more clearly. I think some priests marry to prove that they can. If they have the option, they won't need to do that. But if they don't have the option, many will probably marry.
Merton's words appeal to me. But, 27 years later, optional celibacy doesn't seem to be in sight. We have some married priests in the Latin rite who are converts from other denominations, but no optional celibacy. I wonder, will this still be true 27 years from now?



Recent Comments