Also Blogging at...

Miscellany

  • About Me

    My name is Steve Bogner, a 40-something husband and father of two boys in Cincinnati, OH. Extremism - whether conservative or liberal or whatever - is something I try to avoid. The world isn't perfect, the truth is usually in the middle, and things are rarely as simple as they seem.


  • About My Blog

    This is a moderate, Jesuit-flavored Catholic blog. I'll write about Catholicism, holiness and spirituality along with a bit of politics, social justice and Catholic mystics. I'm not an expert in any of these, but if you like reading about them, then this is a place to do that.


  • Banner Credits

    The icons in the page banner are from Fr William Hart McNichols, S.J. His work can be purchased online at www.TaosTraditions.com. The icons in my header are explained here.

  • Licensing
    Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

« January 2008 | Main | March 2008 »

February 2008

February 17, 2008

A Fine Line

Did you catch the news that France's president Nicolas Sarkozy has instructed French schools to teach every fifth grader 'to learn the life story of one of the 11,000 French children killed by the Nazis in the Holocaust'? It seems to have created quite a stir in France, according to the NY Times article. Sarkozy went a bit further, too, by stating that 'the Nazi belief in a hierarchy of races “radically incompatible with Judeo-Christian monotheism.” I wasn't aware, but it seems Mr Sarkozy has been talking a bit more about religion:

But there is something else. Mr. Sarkozy is shattering another barrier in French intellectual life: religion. His public statements on the subject seem to reflect a deeply held belief that religious values have an important place in everyday French society — an iconoclastic position for a French politician.

When Mr. Sarkozy was made an Honorary Canon of the Basilica of St. John Lateran in Rome last December, he proposed a “positive secularism” that “does not consider religions a danger, but an asset.” He was even more provocative in declaring that “the schoolteacher will never be able to replace the priest or the pastor” in teaching the difference between good and evil.

In Saudi Arabia last month, he infused his speech with more than a dozen references to God, who, he said, “liberates” man. He also said last month that it was a mistake to delete the reference to “Europe’s Christian roots” from the European Constitution.

In France, a country where one’s religion is typically kept private, Mr. Sarkozy heralds his religious identity, referring publicly to his Jewish grandfather and wearing his Roman Catholicism on his sleeve.

“I am of Catholic culture, Catholic tradition, Catholic belief, even if my religious practice is episodic,” he wrote in a book of essays in 2004. “I consider myself as a member of the Catholic Church.”

Well, France's 'secularists' and 'political opponents' set off alarms about all this, and eventually started blaming the United States:

Other analysts blamed the confessional approach of the United States for infecting Mr. Sarkozy’s thinking. “Listen, it’s in the air of the times,” said Régis Debray, the philosopher and author, on France Inter radio Friday. “There is a religious sentimentality, a pretty vague religiousness, let’s say, in the world of show business, in the world of business, that comes from America. It’s the neoconservative wave of the born-agains.”

I can see why many in France might be uncomfortable with all this. I wouldn't want any US president dictating what should be taught in schools; that's a legislative action that ought to be made more by educators and parents, not politicians. Yet, I admire Sarkozy for not hiding his religious life from the world. He doesn't claim to be a perfect Catholic (who is?), but he acknowledges the positive role faith plays in his life and can play in society. Religion can be an asset, it can liberate, and it is at the root of much that is good in history and society.

And yes, religion can bind and suppress, it can be a drag on public policy, and many have suffered violence and tyranny in the name of this-or-that religion. That is also part of our history and our heritage. Like every other social movement, religion cuts both ways.

For those leaders and politicians who are religious, there is a fine line between religion that informs their decisions and religion that dictates their decisions. Hopefully, Sarkozy is tending towards the former and not the latter; and I hope the same holds true for our next US president.

February 11, 2008

Working through the changes

I've had a theory lately that Catholicism will get a boost as the Vatican 2 and post-Vatican 2 generations age and make way for the younger generations. The Vatican 2 generation is those who came of age during Vatican 2, and they are age 47 to 64 now. The post-Vatican 2 generation is my generation, those aged 26-46. The next generation down the line is the Millenial generation, aged 18-25.

CARA recently did a survey, reported on by Catholic News Service, where they mentioned how these various groups viewed the church's rules on marriage:

The survey report divided respondents into four generational groups: the pre-Second Vatican Council generation, ages 65 and over in 2007, who made up 19 percent of the respondents; the Vatican II generation, ages 47-64, 31 percent; the post-Vatican II generation, ages 26-46, 40 percent; and the millennial generation, ages 18-25, 10 percent.

"Agreement with church teachings is ... often relatively high among the oldest Catholics. ... To a lesser extent this is also true of the millennial generation," the report said. "Agreement with church teaching is sometimes lowest among the generation of Catholics who came of age during the changes associated with Vatican II and among post-Vatican II-generation Catholics."

Agreement with the church is highest in the old folks and the young folks; those of us in the middle are still battling and arguing about those issues. I've noticed this in different studies that I've read about, and I've seen it with my own friends and family members. It just goes to show how disruptive change can be, and how long it takes to work its way through a group of people.

February 09, 2008

Enlighten our hearts

I read in a few places (here's one) the past couple days about peoples' reactions to changes the pope made in one of the Easter prayers used in the Latin mass. The reformulated prayer calls for Jews' hearts to be enlightened so that the may acknowledge Jesus Christ. Understandably, some Jewish leaders are kind of upset about that; they were expecting a different reformulation, probably something closer to the current version of the 1970 missal: "Let us pray for the Jewish people, the first to hear the word of God, that they may continue to grow in the love of his name and in faithfulness to his covenant."

And so Cardinal Kasper is trying to make the best of this, essentially saying we cleaned up some of the more offensive terms in the prayer but we still have to be true to who we are as Christians by praying for Jews to acknowledge Jesus as the Messiah. But heck, why stop with the Jews? Why not add Muslims, Hindus and Buddhists to the prayer? And the atheists and animists, why not?

Well of course we Christians want everyone to join us! This is an evangelistic religion after all, it's part what we're called to do. But, how we do that makes a lot of difference. And I don't believe the changes to the Latin Easter prayer are the right way to accomplish any sort of evangelization or conversion because they are not respectful.

Explicitly calling out one group for conversion seems like an unhealthy preoccupation. Why get stuck on the Jews? Why not call for the conversion of all people? I can understand why Jews would be upset about this.

May all our hearts be enlightened this Lenten and Easter season, regardless of where we worship, or if we worship at all. A truly heart-felt enlightenment will call us to deeper mutual respect and acceptance. As someone once said: 'love your neighbor'. Inherent in love is respect.

February 04, 2008

Pre-Lenten Festivities

As a kid, my family never did anything special in the run-up to Lent. No Mardi-Gras parties, no Carnival, no Shrove Tuesday - just business-as-usual until Ash Wednesday in my  German-American family; and then during Lent on Friday's we abstained from meat and went to the Stations of the Cross in the evening. Looking back, I missed out on a lot of fun.

So this year, in the few days before Lent, my wife and I are on vacation in Aruba... without the kids... so that feels like a bit of a pre-Lenten celebration. And, we got to see the 54th Grand Carnival Parade in downtown Oranjasted. It was something to see! I had always wanted to see a carnival parade, and this one was fun to watch even if it wasn't quite what I expected. The whole island pretty much shut-down on Sunday, and Monday turns out to be a national holiday; imagine that.

Tuesday night they will have another, smaller parade that culminates around midnight with the burning of King Momo - an effigy of a fat king that symbolizes the pleasures of the flesh. That sounds more fun than eating pancakes.

Search Me



The Neighborhood